The regulation brings with it many challenges, one of which is the new set of requirements dealing with inducements which aims to strengthen the protection of investors and increase clarity to clients as to the quality of services they receive. As the impact of those changes will vary across countries, investment manager distributing funds across the European Union will need to rethink their strategy and adapt accordingly.
The MiFID II Directive 2014/65 deals with the payment to, and/or receipt from, a third party of inducements in relation to the provision of services to clients of investment firms. In general, companies are strictly only permitted to pay, or be paid, an inducement (namely, a fee, commission or non-monetary benefit) where the payment or benefit if designed to enhance the quality of service to the client and (sic!) at the same time do not impair the firm’s ability to act honestly, fairly, professionally and in the best interests of its clients. According to the Delegated Directive (Commission Delegated Directive 2017/593), an inducement should not be accepted if it results in the provision of the relevant services to the client being biased or distorted. Furthermore, the existence, nature and amount of the payment or benefit must be clearly disclosed to the client.
With the additional and specific disclosure requirements, the mechanisms for recording and transferring any fees and, among others, the impact on independent advisers/asset managers, the MiFID II regime goes much further that that under MiFID I. Therefore, the new investor protection rules are set to likely reshape the financial markets’ product and distribution strategies.
We have produced a paper for further reading. The paper is for Compliance, Legal and MiFID II decision makers that need guidance on how to deal with inducements and how to enhance the quality of service to the client.
